31.10.2004
on a chang? d’heure ou c’est encore mon ordi qui d?conne ??
(nan passke la derni?re fois qu’il a d?conn? dans son calendrier interne, je me suis retrouv?e en 2054 donc bon…)
on a chang? d’heure ou c’est encore mon ordi qui d?conne ??
(nan passke la derni?re fois qu’il a d?conn? dans son calendrier interne, je me suis retrouv?e en 2054 donc bon…)
on a chang? d’heure et on n’est qu’? 2053
What I admire in your Art, is the accuracy of your timing.
Yes, the subjects are very well chosen. Yes, the light is always excellent. Yes, the exactitude of your framing is second to none.
But above all, I believe that you are a wizard when it comes to freeze time. Your pictures could be taken one second earlier or one second later and they wouldn’t have the same impact. Your true talent is to be able to press the shutter at the very moment the various elements in the scene are all where and how they should be. You steal a perfect moment in a blink of an eye and make it eternity.
And you don’t know what time it is? How ironic!!
i couldn’t see things that way before i read your comment, but i like that sort of irony, even though time doesn’t matter much anymore as soon as i look through a viewfinder.
i want to thank you, even when those two words don’t seem to express much of what i feel like saying for your comment. i’m completely unable to realize by myself all that you said, which is probably better even though i find frustrating my lack of distance and discernment about what i do. i can only tell if a picture is bad, should-have-been-better or good. it’s frustrating as well somehow to never ever be able to see my pictures the way that other people may see them…the way you seem to see them.
so thank you for your words, really.
et oldcola, merci de l’info, j’me teleporte au cambridge arms asap pour te remercier de vive voix. et si la teleportation n’existe toujours pas en 2053, j’vois pas l’interet de meme penser ? passer en 2005 ;)
I want to think that you are humble and modest and that you don’t just see your pictures as being “Good”, “Average” or “Poor”.
You have a Gift, something that was given to you by a superior being (Call it God, or whatever): You are able to see things; not just with your eyes, like most of us, not just with you heart, like some of us, but with your soul, your guts, with every inch of your sensitivity.
You have another Gift: Sometimes, not only you see things, but you are also able to capture them, to steal them, to make them yours for eternity, just by pressing a small button on a camera.
Now, to me, this is a miracle. You don’t seem to be taking beautiful pictures by accident, like 99.999999% of photographers. You take beautiful pictures on a consistent basis.
Okay, let’s say that, consciously, you don’t realise that. Isn’t there a little voice in you head that says: “I am on a mission. I can do something that others can’t. I am going to work very hard, and perfect my technique, and master my camera, until I know that my pictures are not just a piece of paper, but something much higher, much deeper, something that other people universally admire”?
Why are you taking pictures? To make money? (I don’t think so. You know how hard and unfair it is!)
Can you stop taking pictures? Probably not. Why?
D’apr?s ce que j ai lu, il faudrait ce retrouver en 2046 … et pas en 2054
Comprenne qui pourras.
photolondon, the truth is, a very few of my pictures make it to “outstanding” to my eyes. the last that came the closest to that was in the “one day 49” series. i’m probably my worse judge.
i admire your insight about the little voice. yes, there is something telling me to just go on and make pictures, and show what i see and how i see everything. this isn’t just about making something that will be universally admired ; whether people will like a picture or not, i just wish it would be able to touch them, shake them, make them feel something, just like making pictures touches me, shakes me sometimes, and makes me feel something. what it is, i don’t know, and i can’t put together the exact words to answer to the whys. somehow i hope that if i never stop, that if i discover more about what i take pictures of, it will answer the questions that you asked and that i ask myself, too.
I guess it’s better not to know why. There are whys that help you go on and the answers (cause there can’t be one and only answer) are in your pictures. nowhere else.
yes, that’s what i meant, to know that the answers are in my pictures, cause i don’t believe i could find words anyway. besides, i know that viewers might have a lot better insight in what i do than i could have — frustrating yet reassuring somehow.
Well Ju, I entirely agree with you and this is exactly my point. You don’t know why you take pictures, but you keep on doing it. You have to do it because it is in your genes. It is your purpose in life to touch people with your images. That’s what a gift is: An ability to do something better than the others for the purpose of giving something back to them.
So what is my point? When you say that it is frustrating because you are not able to see your pictures the way other people do, you miss the point: You will never be entirely satisfied of your “creation”. But if you look at the reactions of most people around you when they see your work, you will see that you are actually touching them very deeply, you make them think, you make them react, and often you bring them happiness or amazement or a little sparkle in their boring every day life.
Your own happiness should come from this ability you have to touch the souls, the hearts, the guts of the others, just by showing them a few pictures.
…and yes, my happiness comes from it indeed. when i said i’m frustrated sometimes, it’s when i read comments like yours, thoughtful and insightful, and that i realize that there’s a world i can’t grasp in my pictures and that viewers can.
but it also shows that maybe i’ve touched something in them, like you said…and that alone is able to make me go on. so thanks again for telling me all this, obviously you know what it means to me…